About Ron and his Workshop

Segal Electronics laboratory, Moonshine Hill Road, Upper Hutt
Our electronics development laboratory and fabrication workshop, Moonshine Valley, Upper Hutt

I'm Ron Segal, an engineer (CEng, Eur Ing) based in rural Upper Hutt, New Zealand. My career has covered software development, real-time systems development, technical business analysis, design methodologies, human/machine interfacing, digital circuits design and practical electronic construction in both the UK and New Zealand. Most of my work has focused on what I both excel at and enjoy: taking an awkward process-related or technical problem, working out what is really needed, and then building something practical to solve it.

A broad engineering background

I have worked across a wide and often deep combination of disciplines, including:

That breadth is useful because many real-world problems do not fit neatly into one discipline. A sensing problem may also require firmware, radio communications and a web interface. A machine-vision problem may need lighting, mechanical mounting, image processing and software integration. A simple monitoring device may involve electronics, enclosure design, networking and power management. I am less interested in applying a specific technology than in finding an efficient, practical way to make something useful work, often with an emphasis on innovative cost reduction.

The workshop

I work from my own electronics and prototyping workshop in Upper Hutt. It is equipped for practical development work including:

This means I can usually take an idea from an initial experiment through to a working physical prototype, often entirely in-house.

Types of Work

I am now semi-retired and deliberately take on a limited amount of outside work. That gives me the freedom to concentrate on projects where experience, experimentation and technical judgement are genuinely useful. I am particularly interested in:

How I tend to work

I normally start with the problem rather than a predetermined solution. Often the first step is simply to establish whether an idea is practical. That may involve a temporary circuit, some software, a sensor, a camera, a rough mechanical arrangement or a deliberately simple, minimum viable prototype. If the basic idea works, it can then be refined into something more complete.

I generally prefer this staged approach to committing immediately to a large development project. It keeps costs and risk under control and allows both sides to decide whether further development is worthwhile. I also deliberately avoid work where a fixed delivery date is the overriding requirement. I prefer projects where a well designed cost effective outcome matters more than working to a tight schedule.

If you have an unusual technical problem, an inefficiency that ought to be resolved, or an idea that needs turning into something real, I would be interested to discuss whether and how this might be practically achieved.

Ron Segal at Segal Electronics Lab
Ron

Ron Segal CEng Eur Ing
Segal Electronics